(no subject)
Apr. 2nd, 2010 10:14 pmOMG Ashes to Ashes HOW I LOVE YOUR CRAZY TWISTINESS!
It's twisty, like Lost, but unlike Lost it may actually make sense when it concludes.
Bullet-points of squee!
Oh Auntie Beeb... I do love it when you finally emerge out of the new-year slump of TV not worth watching. With new A2A and New Who tomorrow you are almost spoiling me...
It's twisty, like Lost, but unlike Lost it may actually make sense when it concludes.
Bullet-points of squee!
- Sweet Dreams for the unveiling of the Quattro!
- A coma within a coma! (within a coma?)
- Gene slapping Alex back into consciousness!
- Ray dressed like a maths teacher!
- Creepy Jim! (He wants to help Alex.)
- Things that happen at exactly 9:06!
- Sam references galore!
- Stomach-churning burn victim's peeling skin! (Seriously, that was just gross.)
- Mysterious Sam file!
- Foreshadowing for the purpose of raising doubts about Gene!
- Dead policeman on a hill with half a face haunting Alex and GRINNING!
- Bad things that happened three years ago!
- More Sam mystery next week!
Oh Auntie Beeb... I do love it when you finally emerge out of the new-year slump of TV not worth watching. With new A2A and New Who tomorrow you are almost spoiling me...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 01:48 am (UTC)**goes to sit in the corner and pout**
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 08:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:41 am (UTC)I think it's YAY GENE, but to be honest it's mostly because it would feel like a massive fake-out to suddenly have him be the bad guy. It's too easy making him into the devil, and so far the show has shied away from the easy path. But if they manage to make us doubt him, then the redemption will be that much sweeter, so I sincerely hope that's what they're going for. It would fit with every single story arch they've had so far...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 11:06 am (UTC)Well that makes it stranger.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 11:37 am (UTC)